A bid to exonerate two men in a Buffalo-area murder centers on the possible role in the crime of Richard Matt, a notorious New York killer.
TONAWANDA, N.Y. — In February 1993, Deborah Meindl walked into her house in this working-class Buffalo suburb on a blustery Wednesday afternoon, and never left.
Police reports recount what happened: Ms. Meindl, a nursing student with two young daughters, was stabbed dozens of times, her hands cuffed behind her back, and strangled with a man’s tie that was left around her neck.
Suspicions quickly fell on her husband, who had spoken about having his wife killed, according to court records. But the investigation soon pivoted to two petty thieves who were later convicted of murder despite a lack of forensic evidence linking either to the crime.
Now, an explosive new claim is at the center of a renewed effort by defense lawyers to clear the two: The real killer was one of New York’s most infamous criminals, Richard Matt, whose 2015 escape from a state prison set off a nationwide manhunt that ended when he was fatally shot by a federal agent.
The new theory emerged from a monthslong investigation by two prosecutors from the Erie County, N.Y., district attorney’s office, who presented their findings — and their belief in Mr. Matt’s involvement — to their boss, John J. Flynn, the district attorney, in August.
But Mr. Flynn rejected the findings, demoted one of the prosecutors and reassigned the other. He said he could not comment on personnel issues, but said the two men had been removed because they “did not accept my decision with the professionalism expected of career prosecutors.” His office said that despite the lack of forensic evidence there was still ample trial testimony to support the convictions.
Lawyers for the convicted men make another incendiary claim in court filings: Not only did Mr. Matt kill Ms. Meindl; he may have carried out the murder at the behest of the lead detective who investigated the crime, David Bentley.
On Tuesday, Mr. Bentley adamantly denied any role and offered to take a lie-detector test.
“It’s totally, absolutely, unequivocally insane,” Mr. Bentley said, adding that he had not known Ms. Meindl and had testified against Mr. Matt in a different murder case.
“I could never say that stuff,” Mr. Bentley said of his testimony in that case, “and have hired him to murder somebody.”
In a motion filed in State Supreme Court in Buffalo last month, the defense lawyers said there is evidence that Mr. Matt confessed to killing Ms. Meindl in 2015. He made the confession to his fellow escapee, David Sweat, according to another document. Mr. Sweat is imprisoned in Ulster County.
Adding more mystery to an already perplexing case, recent DNA sampling of crime scene evidence has excluded both men convicted in the murder — and Mr. Matt.
On Wednesday, in a Buffalo courtroom, lawyers for the men convicted in the killing, James Pugh and Brian Scott Lorenz, cited the DNA evidence, Mr. Bentley’s ties to Mr. Matt and inconsistencies in prosecution witnesses’ accounts as reasons their clients should be cleared.
Mr. Pugh, who was recently paroled after 25 years in prison, was there; Mr. Lorenz appeared via video from the state prison in Auburn, N.Y., where he remains. Ms. Meindl’s daughter, Lisa Payne, sat in the front row.
Justice Christopher J. Burns seemed inclined to favor a deep re-examination of the case — “I’d like to get an answer to this,” he said — raised the prospect of an additional hearing.
“I knew, in my heart, that I didn’t commit this crime,” Mr. Lorenz said in an interview last month, adding, “But I never gave up.”
In a statement, Mr. Flynn, a Democrat, flatly denied that there was any credible evidence “to link Richard Matt to the murder of Deborah Meindl.” He also defended his response to the findings of the prosecutors who revisited the case.
“I, along with my entire senior leadership team, several of my senior bureau chiefs and most experienced trial attorneys, disagreed with their conclusions due to a lack of any credible evidence,” he said.
Because the two prosecutors have not detailed their findings publicly, it is not fully clear what they believe implicates Mr. Matt. Neither man would comment, although one is seeking to testify in the case, court filings show. Both still work for Mr. Flynn.
Mr. Bentley helped raise Mr. Matt’s daughter Jamie, who once wrote that the detective “knew my father probably as well as anyone on the outside.” In an interview and text messages, Mr. Bentley, who retired in 2003, acknowledged having had a close relationship with Mr. Matt — whom he used as an informant — bordering on that of father-son.
“I related to Rick: I felt bad for him,” Mr. Bentley said. “You could almost say I loved the kid.”
But he does not believe Mr. Matt — a convicted killer — could have murdered Ms. Meindl, saying, “he was just a punk” and “wasn’t a candidate for a crime like that.”
“Somebody planted the idea about him just to defend Pugh and Lorenzo,” he said.
Mr. Bentley also suggested that Mr. Matt “was known to brag about all sorts of stuff that never existed.”
After Ms. Meindl was killed, suspicion initially fell on her husband, Donald Meindl, who was in his early 30s and a Taco Bell manager at the time. A friend told the police that Mr. Meindl had once sought his advice about hiring someone to kill his wife. “It should be made to look like a robbery,” the friend recalled Mr. Meindl saying, court records show.
Mr. Meindl, who did not respond to interview requests, insisted that he was joking and has always maintained his innocence. Police and court records describe an open marriage and Mr. Meindl’s involvement with a 17-year-old girl who worked for him. He had an alibi: The day of the murder, he was at work getting fired for sexual harassment.
After a tip from an informant, investigators at the time shifted their focus to Mr. Lorenz, a 23-year-old with a history of minor crimes who was in Iowa after being arrested for car theft.
Desperate to return home, Mr. Lorenz concocted a bizarre plan to confess to Deborah Meindl’s murder, according to his defense team, and implicated Mr. Pugh, his sometime burglary partner, thinking it would bolster his story. He told a police officer he was innocent, but was willing to plead guilty to a manslaughter charge, according to a prosecution filing.
Mr. Lorenz’s confession got details wrong — for instance, he said a hogtie was used when one was not — and it was deemed inadmissible at trial. Still, the jury returned a guilty verdict in less than six hours. (Mr. Lorenz’s name was listed as “Lorenzo” in court records although his legal name is Lorenz.)
Mr. Pugh was in his 30s when the slaying occurred. “I was a criminal,” he said in an interview. “But I certainly wasn’t somebody that would kill somebody. I’m not capable of that.”
Mr. Lorenz, who is still in prison, recalled being incredulous at the verdict. “I can’t believe, I can’t believe this,” he said in an interview. He added: “Anger turns into bewilderment, then the depression sets in.”
Then in 2018 a state judge forced Erie County officials to conduct DNA testing of blood-splattered items from the crime scene. Neither man’s DNA was found.
Mr. Lorenz was elated.
“I thought I was going home immediately,” he said.
Instead, earlier this year, Mr. Flynn’s office appointed two prosecutors to review the case, Michael J. Hillery, who ran the office’s appeals bureau, and David A. Heraty, an assistant district attorney.
After interviewing more than 50 witnesses, Mr. Hillery called Ilann Maazel, a civil rights lawyer representing Mr. Lorenz, and told him that the prosecutors believed his client was innocent. Moreover, they suspected Mr. Matt.
“I almost fell out of my chair,” Mr. Maazel said.
Mr. Pugh’s lawyer, Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma, said he was “gratified that honest, courageous prosecutors followed the evidence.”
In a court filing last month, Mr. Lorenz’s lawyers said Ms. Meindl had been having an affair with Mr. Bentley and had become aware of unspecified acts of corruption by the detective. The detective, the filing said, had “sent Matt to murder her to ensure that she would not tell anyone else what she knew.”
During his career, Mr. Bentley was the subject of at least 15 police brutality and harassment complaints, The Buffalo News has reported. But in interviews, he defended his record, saying he was tough but never corrupt.
“I solved more crimes than the whole department did because I was savvy,” he said on Tuesday. “But I was not crooked.”
He also insisted he had been not in a romantic relationship with Ms. Meindl, a denial that Mr. Flynn echoed.
In a filing this week, Mr. Flynn’s office assailed Mr. Heraty, suggesting that he had essentially fed details of the crime to Mr. Sweat, the onetime fugitive. Mr. Heraty has declined to sign an affidavit agreeing to those findings, and has said he wants to testify in the matter.
On Wednesday, Mr. Maazel and Mr. Margulis-Ohnuma suggested than Mr. Sweat’s testimony would most likely be included at any future hearing, possibly as soon as Dec. 13.
In a late September letter to Mr. Heraty that was turned over to the defense, Mr. Sweat suggested that he could offer another plausible explanation to who had killed Deborah Meindl.
“It’s been 6 ½ years since he told me and until you showed up it wasn’t real to me,” Mr. Sweat wrote, adding that he was concerned about the prosecutor being removed from the case and angry about “the two guys being in prison too who didn’t do it!”
“I hope,” he wrote, “someone is working on that.”
Benjamin Weiser contributed reporting. Susan C. Beachy contributed research.
"in" - Google News
November 03, 2021 at 04:00PM
https://ift.tt/3k1ykL1
He Escaped Prison in 2015. Did He Kill a Young Mother Decades Before? - The New York Times
"in" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MLa3Y1
https://ift.tt/2YrnuUx
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "He Escaped Prison in 2015. Did He Kill a Young Mother Decades Before? - The New York Times"
Post a Comment